Saturday, September 19, 2015

Wondrous Love










The greatest wonder of my life is that of being loved. 
The love that I have known did not come by heritage. 
It flowed not from the wellspring of my earthly parentage,
      but from a deeper purer well. 
Sin makes one obdurate, one’s own sin and the sin of others.
      My heart was adamantine,
      closed by the vagaries and vicissitudes of life. 
His love is pure,
      a richly flowing stream
      from the wounds in his hands, his feet, his side. 
His love is not in words alone, but
      in a work of such profound humility
      that he left the throne at his Father’s side
            and was born one of us. 
      Bone of our bone,
      flesh of our flesh,
            broken for us and for all who will receive him. 
He is my steadfast love, he who loved me so
To him alone I open my heart and pray in wonder and awe,
      “Enter in and take your place on the throne of my life
            even as you have risen and ascended
            and taken your seat at your Father’s right hand.”
      “Whom have I in heaven but thee, 
       and having thee there is nothing upon earth that I desire.”

Friday, September 18, 2015

Snakes and Vipers and Poisonous Creatures



A Reflection on Elements of Warfare in Teresa of Avila’s “Interior Castle”

You and I have had our share of wrestling with the snakes and vipers and poisonous creatures; but many children of the world, always giving into temptation, have no awareness of the role of tempters.  For the children of the world temptation and tempters are a joke.  

Alfie’s song in My Fair Lady tells the story:

The Lord above made liquor for temptation,
To see if man could turn away from sin.
The Lord above made liquor for temptation, but
With a little bit o' luck,
With a little bit o' luck,
When temptation comes you'll give right in![i]

We live in a dangerous world.  And the dangers that confront us can be lethal.  Surrender to Alfie’s temptation can lead to ruined marriages, abused children, loss of jobs, and ultimately loss of life itself.  The joke is no joke.

Isaiah describes this world of ours as a Habitation of Dragons:

Thorns shall grow over its strongholds,
nettles and thistles in its fortresses.
It shall be the habitation of dragons
a court of owls.
And wild animals shall meet with howlers;
the satyr shall cry to his fellow;
indeed, there the night hag settles
and finds for herself a resting place.[ii]

We live our lives in the habitation of dragons, in the den of snakes and vipers and poisonous creatures, and when we approach the door of our Interior Castle they enter along with us.  By our long unperceptive association with them they have in a sense earned the right of entrance.   Our settled habits and accepted weaknesses are dangerous.  Teresa tells us that we are so accustomed to living with that vile horde that they enter the first rooms of the castle along with us, and make it difficult for us to “appreciate the beauty of the castle or to find any peace within it.”[iii]

Teresa gives us notice, “Remember that in few of the mansions of this castle are we free from struggles with devils,”[iv] and that “the devil’s intentions are always very bad, he has many legions of evil spirits in each room to prevent souls from passing from one (mansion) to another, and as we, poor souls, fail to realize this we are tricked by all kinds of deceptions.”[v]

            C. S. Lewis rightly remarks, “There are two equal and opposite errors into which our race can fall about the devils.  One is to disbelieve in their existence.  The other is to believe, and to feel and excessive and unhealthy interest in them.  They themselves are equally pleased by both errors, and hail a materialist or a magician with the same delight.”[vi] 

As twenty-first century Christians, we are much more apt to err on the side of ignoring the reality of devils, than be spooked by Teresa’s clear teaching in this area.  The reason for Teresa’s concern is the negative effect that these devils have on our spiritual perception.  She says, “(I hardly know how to explain myself) because there are so many bad things—snakes and vipers and poisonous creatures—which have come in with the soul that they prevent it from seeing the light.”[vii]   Indeed, “being among such poisonous things, it (the soul) cannot, at some time or another, escape being bitten by them.”[viii]  That may at first glance be uncomfortable, but it is very important.  To change the analogy, if I know where the poison ivy is, most of the time I will try to avoid walking barefoot in it.  Most of the time.  On the other hand we have a propensity to think somehow that we are immune and become careless.

Teresa tells us that “There are a multitude of ways in which he (the devil) can deceive us, and gradually make his way into the castle, and until he is actually there we do not realize it.”[ix]  Our own spiritual experience should tell us that our early warning signals need to be finely tuned.  When the moment comes that we realize we have been bitten by poisonous vipers it is time for us once more to visit the Room of Self-knowledge.  When we have been snake bitten, it is instructive to start where we are and trace our steps backward.  It is rather like trying to find something you have lost.  Walk backward in your  memory and try to find where that particular temptation began to arise.  Sometimes we don’t have to look very far; but at other times we may indeed pull on the end of that thread of memory and unravel a whole sequence of uncomfortable events.

There is a marvellous scene in the movie ‘The Iron Lady’ in which Lady Margaret Thatcher comments on habits.  She says, “Watch your thoughts for they become words.  Watch you words for they become actions.  Watch your actions for they become habits.  Watch your habits for they become your character, and watch your character for it becomes your destiny!”[x]  Our society tends to look for the origin of our problems in our feelings, but what biblical basis is there for this?  Jesus didn’t ask Peter, James, Andrew, or Judas how they felt about things; he gave them a choice, “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me.”[xi] 

It is not that feelings have no importance, after all even a casual reading of the Psalms will make it clear that we are to take our feelings to the God who is the mender of broken hearts, and it is clear that feelings, both negative and positive can be a driving force in our lives, particularly when we don’t recognize and understand them.  Emotions run riot are a symptom of spiritual snake bite.  Note the Biblical emphasis: We are to rule our feelings; our feelings are not to rule us.  “A man without self-control is a city broken into and left without walls,”[xii] and “Be angry and sin not,”[xiii] and “For this reason I remind you to fan into flame the gift of God, which is in you through the laying on of my hands, for God gave us a spirit not of fear but of power and love and self-control.”[xiv]   At every step of our life looking backwards and forwards we have the responsibility that comes from making choices, and each choice is an act of the will.

The search for the knowledge and Presence of God will lead us from time to time  back to that room of self-knowledge.   A burst of ill-temper may be only the result of not enough sleep and a poor diet indicating a need for better care for some of the simple basics of life.  On the other hand a burst of ill-temper may uncover a whole thread of unresolved and unforgiven things that need to be resolved.  Some of these things may reach far back into our childhood and to the models set by our parents. 

It is a grace to hear the Lord say, "What do you mean by repeating this proverb concerning the land of Israel, 'The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge'?  3 As I live, declares the Lord GOD, this proverb shall no more be used by you in Israel.”[xv]  Through self-knowledge and the grace of God we can arm ourselves in the battle against the vipers, and by grace rule our feelings. 




[i] Alan Jay Lerner, “My Fair Lady”, 1964
[ii] Isaiah 35: 13-14 (Note that the night hag in Hebrew is Le-Leeth, from which we get Lilith
[iii] Teresa of Avila, The Interior Castle, E. Allison Peers, trans, and ed. (New York; Doubleday, 1989, p. 33
[iv] Ibid. p.41
[v] Ibid. p.40
[vi] C. S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters, (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996).    p. 15
[vii] Teresa, p. 40
[viii] Ibid. p. 41, (bracket added for clarity)
[ix] Ibid. p. 42
[x] “The Iron Lady”, Pathé, 20th Century Fox, 2012
[xi] Luke 9:23
[xii] Proverbs 25:28
[xiii] Psalm 4:4
[xiv] 2 Timothy 1:6-7  
[xv] Ezekiel 18:2-3  

Wednesday, September 9, 2015

An Exercise in Personal Lectio Divina: Read, Reflect, Respond, Rest.


In reading St. Paul’s Letter to the Ephesians I have been listening with my heart for the voice of God. In reading the first ten verses of Ephesians Chapter One, the first thing that I hear is that it is not just God, but God the Father, Who is at work. The text says,

 “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places, even as he [God the Father] chose us in Christ before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him in love” [Ephesians 1:3-4].

The introduction is Christ centered. It is Jesus the Christ who brings us to the Father, and the Father who adopts us in Christ, as His own. This, for me as one who was literally disinherited by my father and mother, is intensely personal. By the redemptive work of Christ, God the Father has adopted me.

Now I know that the pronoun in Ephesians is plural, not singular; it is not me alone who has been adopted, it is me, as a member of the Body of Christ, who has been adopted. Nevertheless, in Christ, it is God my father who has called me also “son,” and in awe I call Him Father. “Our Father, who art in Heaven,” was never meant to exclude me as an individual.

“In love the Father predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of the Father’s will, to the praise of the Father’s glorious grace, with which the Father has blessed us in the Beloved” [Ephesians 1:5].

A number of translations render the Greek word for “adoption as sons,” as “adoption as children,” or even more simply just as “adoption.” But the word for adoption means “adoption as sons.” There is a concern today to neuter texts and make them politically correct; but that is not the same thing as the realization that even the daughters are sons of God.

In love I have been predestined to adoption as a son through Jesus Christ, according the purpose of the Father’s will. The Psalmist says, “The LORD will fulfill his purpose for me; your steadfast love, O LORD, endures forever. Do not forsake the work of your hands” [Psalm 138:8].


It is the Father’s will that has called me forth out of my family background, with its pains and joys, and adopted me as His son, one son out of many sons and daughters. God the Father, being infinite, has personal private time for me and for each of his children; time bound as we are. To which, my prayer response is very simply, “Father, thank you!”

Thursday, August 27, 2015

Impossible Tasks













Why St. Benedict?  Benedict was the 6th Century saint and founder of the Order of St. Benedict, and he was remarkable for his sense of balance in spirituality.  He said, “Give the strong something to yearn for, and the weak nothing to run from.”

One of my favourite chapters in the Rule of St. Benedict is titled, “If a Brother Is Commanded to Do Impossible Things.”  There are times in our experience when our perceived responsibilities seem to extend far beyond what we think we can reasonably accomplish.  Benedict wrote:

“If it happens that difficult or impossible tasks are laid on a brother, let him nevertheless receive the order of the one in authority with all meekness and obedience. But if he sees that the weight of the burden altogether exceeds the limit of his strength, let him submit the reasons for his inability to the one who is over him in a quiet way and at an opportune time, without pride, resistance, or contradiction.  And if after these representations the Superior still persists in his decision and command, let the subject know that this is for his good, and let him obey out of love, trusting in the help of God” (The Rule of St. Benedict, Chapter 68).

There are times when the burden of the day seems overwhelming; the difficulty being twofold.  First, two or three tasks are pressing and foremost in our minds, but we have not objectified the “Do List,” and what we end up doing is fretting over them instead of strategizing what needs to be done.  Second, we don’t recognize the limit of what ought to be done in a day. 

Yesterday’s tasks, done, or not done, are past.  A few of them may migrate onto today’s “Do List”.  Some of them, it turns out, didn’t really need to be done, or at least, not by us.  Tomorrow’s tasks cannot be accomplished today; they perhaps can be scheduled, and at best organized.  The latter, if done too soon, may be a useless spinning of wheels; sometimes when tomorrow's tasks becomes today’s tasks, the organization is often more effective.

There is another important element that needs to be recognized.  It is important to live with a mixture of courage and forgiveness.  Benedict allows for our weakness by allowing us to acknowledge what we think are our reasons for not being able to accomplish a task.  The recognition of personal limitations is after all a basic principle in spirituality.  The psalmist says, “I am a man who has no strength.  I am shut in so that I cannot escape. I am helpless” (Psalm 88:4, 8, 15 ESV, RSV). 

We, however, have a tendency to be very hard on ourselves, and even though personal limitations are not sin, we need to hold ourselves in forgiveness; forgiveness for the vaguer guilt of not being able to live up to our own expectations, or the expectations of others.  This must be balanced by the recognition that God gives strength above and far beyond our limited abilities.  The psalmist also says, “Blessed be the Lord, my rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle” (Psalm 144:1).


Faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, calls us to respond to the challenge of each day with courage.  Benedict recommends that we meet the challenge of the day out of love, trusting in the help of God. Hear the word of the Lord, “Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be frightened, and do not be dismayed, for the LORD your God is with you wherever you go" (Joshua 1:9). Be clear about this simple reality, the Lord is with you; take courage as you go forth to meet the labours of the day.

Thursday, August 20, 2015

What I Saw in the Secret Place.















I have seen the edge of your golden crown
Rich gold against the skin tones of your flesh,
      and from beneath that edge
      at your right temple
            a single rivulet of blood
            red against your skin
                        flowed copiously down,
      a reminder that beneath the golden crown
      you yet wear the crown of thorns for me,
            but not for me alone.
            I am one.
            I am one of many.

Our union,
      the communio peccatorum,
      common bond,
      reminds me
      You are one with us.
            Forgive us our trespasses.
            Mine alone.
            Mine as one of many.

Our union,
      the communio sanctorum,
      common destiny,
      uncommon aspiration.
      Make pure our hearts and wills.
      Your gift to humankind:
            We thirst and hear you say,
            “Come beloved of My Father.

I see transposed upon my hands, my feet, my side
Your gaping wounds.
      My brow is circled with your piercing thorns.
            Rivulets of blood flow copiously down.
Through me you suffer for your body,
the Church that you redeem.
      I am crucified with Christ.
      I am one of many.

Body of Christ
      inseparable from the Anointed
      even in His crucifixion.
            I am crucified with Christ,
            Nevertheless I live,
                  yet not I.
                  Christ lives in me,
                  yet not I alone.
                  I am one of many.

                                                      Dom Anselm+

Sunday, August 2, 2015


“In the Psalms where the Holy Spirit speaks to us, it is written….” St. Cyprian, 258 AD[i]

Lord, What Would You Have Me Do?[ii]
          There is some confusion in the contemporary Western Church over ethics. An important dynamic in the study of ethics in Holy Scripture is the understanding that prayer is not a monologue, but a dialogue. Lectio Divina presupposes that God speaks to us and that we should respond: Read the Word, Reflect on the Word, Respond in Prayer, Rest in the Presence of God. When we sing and pray the Psalms we sing and pray them with Jesus Christ the Incarnate Son of God who prays in us and through us. When we pray the Psalms we also pray them with all the Body of Christ throughout the world;, in whatever circumstances our brothers and sisters in Christ find themselves.
Even when we pray an imprecatory prayer; “O God, break the teeth in their mouths; tear out the fangs of the young lions, O LORD!” [Psalm 58:6]; we pray with Jesus Christ who is the Enfleshed Logos; we pray with the persecuted Church, and we pray with the oppressed everywhere. Christ enfleshed in us speaks to us, and gives voice through us, to God the Father.
Lectio Divina takes us a step further; we Rest in the Presence of God, or more literally “before the Face of God. “Seek the LORD, and his strength: seek his face (paw-neem) evermore” [Psalm 105:4]. That dialogical relationship transcends the study of ethics and is the basis of ethics. Ethics says simply, “Now that I am before your face, O God, and before all the Holy Angels; what would you have me do?” If I hear and pray, “O Lord our God (O Yahweh our Adonai) how majestic is your name in all the earth” [Psalm 8:1], how will the majesty of the transcendent and immanent God transform my life; the way I think about things, and the way I act? The question is both personal and corporate; no Christian actually lives apart from the Body of Christ of which he, or she, is a member.
As we dwell in the holy dynamic of Lectio Divina, the Holy Spirit is at work in the transformation of our thoughts and actions. As that mysterious work goes on in His Presence, before His Face, we become radiant, “Look to him, and be radiant; so your faces shall never be ashamed” [Psalm 34:5 NRSV/RSV]. This has strong implications for our understanding of ethics. In his letter St. Peter tells us that as we become partakers of God’s divine nature we are to make every effort to supplement our faith with virtue:
His divine power has granted to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us to his own glory and excellence, by which he has granted to us his precious and very great promises, so that through them you may become partakers of the divine nature, having escaped from the corruption that is in the world because of sinful desire. For this very reason, make every effort to supplement your faith with virtue, and virtue with knowledge, and knowledge with self-control, and self-control with steadfastness, and steadfastness with godliness, and godliness with brotherly affection, and brotherly affection with love. For if these qualities are yours and are increasing, they keep you from being ineffective or unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. For whoever lacks these qualities is so nearsighted that he is blind, having forgotten that he was cleansed from his former sins.[iii]

“The Fear of the Lord (Yahweh) is the beginning of wisdom; all those who practice it have a good understanding” [Proverbs 9:10]. That is to say that in the practice of the awareness of the fear of God we will understand how to live; which of course is the question of ethics. The awe of God is to be met with humility, and with obedience to God who desires to work out his justice (mishpawt) through us in the midst of our wicked world; after all we live in “the habitation of dragons” [Psalm 44:19]. 
We share with Christ the responsibility of ministering justice. C. S. Lewis said “Justice is the old name for fairness; it includes honesty, give and take, truthfulness, keeping promises, and all that side of life.”[iv] Justice is not done in a vacuum, but in the real world as it is. If one is to do justice and righteousness, one will extend oneself to preserve justice in our society and in the world.  Christ incarnate in us desires to work out his justice through us in the very real situations that require our ethical decisions. “Blessed is the man who fears the Lord, who greatly delights in his commandment!...who conducts his affairs with justice” [Psalm 112:1, 5]. Joan Chittister comments, “The Rule of St. Benedict treats work and lectio interchangeably. One focuses the skills of the body on the task of co-creation. The other focuses the gifts of the mind on the lessons of the heart.”[v] Our relationship with God and prayer must be transferred into actions.
St. Benedict tells us in his Rule that his 6th century monks were to pray the entire Psalter in a week, but he points out that earlier monks prayed the entire Psalter in a day. The only Psalm that is prayed in bite size pieces is Psalm 119. That Psalm throughout the course of its 176 verses stresses the importance of the law, not only for the Psalmist, but also for the Church that prays the Psalm. Half of Psalm 119 is prayed in the various Offices of Sunday, the balance of the Psalm is prayed in the Offices on Monday, that is; one begins the week praying about the importance of the law and its place in our lives.  “Oh, how I love your law! It is my meditation all the day” [Psalm 119:97]. The point being that early monasticism and the early Church prayed the Psalter as the basic language and thought form of prayer, including, “how I love your law.” In contemporary Offices Psalm 119 is prayed in the Midday Office being divided up over three days, Sunday through Monday. Where the Midday Office is shuffled aside in favor of the mid-morning Daily Eucharist it blunts the ethical emphasis of praying the Psalms.
What was meant by the law? The basic law in Exodus and Deuteronomy is given in the Ten Commandments. The Ten Commandments included basic life orientation and community relationships, but the ceremonial and food laws were given as an addendum[vi]. We should note in passing that in the addendum the laws regarding basic life orientation and community relationships are applied to specific circumstances and that the New Testament accepts those explications of the law as normative.
Far from approving of society’s sexual mores, St. Paul tells us that such things should not even be named among us [Ephesians 5:2]. That does not stop St. Paul from naming them. In doing so he holds the adulterous within the Church on an equal level with idolaters, greedy, drunkards, and those who practice homosexuality. [vii] There isn’t a nickel’s worth of difference between one reprehensible sin and another.  Then he adds, “And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God” [I Corinthians 6:11].
When compassion for others and our corporate sense of guilt drives us to approve of things in others that Scripture forbids, we are out of balance. There is a difference between human compassion and the holy love of God that flows from the Incarnate Christ within us. Jesus in his mercy doesn’t say, “That’s alright dear; don’t feel badly about what you are doing.” What he says to all of us is, “Neither do I condemn you; go, and from now on sin no more." [John 8:11]. 
When Jesus restates the law in the Sermon on the Mount he teaches about the former, life orientation and community relationships; but he fulfills the ceremonial law in the sacrifice of himself; and he sets the food laws aside. At the same time he re-emphasizes the laws about life orientation and community relationships.
And he called the people to him and said to them, "Hear and understand: it is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, but what comes out of the mouth; this defiles a person." Then the disciples came and said to him, "Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this saying?" He answered, "Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be rooted up. Let them alone; they are blind guides. And if the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit." But Peter said to him, "Explain the parable to us." And he said, "Are you also still without understanding? Do you not see that whatever goes into the mouth passes into the stomach and is expelled? But what comes out of the mouth proceeds from the heart, and this defiles a person. For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false witness, slander.  These are what defile a person. But to eat with unwashed hands does not defile anyone."

            J. B. Phillips’ happy translation, “it is the straight-edge of the Law that shows us how crooked we are” is apt. While we live in the freedom of grace, we have the law to measure ourselves by to see if we are heading in the right direction. This is also reflected in the Rule of St. Benedict,
The first step of humility is that a man always ought to have the fear of God before his eyes ( Ps 35:1), never forgetting it, and always remembering all that God has commanded. He [each brother or sister] should keep in mind that those who despise God will burn in hell for their sins, and that life everlasting is prepared for those who hold God in awe. And while he guards himself always against sin and vices of thought, word, deed, and self-will, let him also make haste to cut off the lusts of the flesh. Let him recall that God always sees him from Heaven, and that the eye of God looks on all his works, and that the angels report his works to God every hour.[viii]

A Benedictine approach to ethics can only worked out in acknowledgement of the awe and majesty of God, and our response of humility and obedience. Once God is held in awe, all other considerations fade away.



[i] St. Cyprian, bishop of Carthage (Epist. 10, 2-3, 5: CSEL 3, 491-492, 494-495)
[ii] Paul’s question at his conversion, Acts 22:10
[iii] 2 Peter 1:3-9  
[iv] Mere Christianity, Chapter 12
[v] Joan Chittister, THE RULE OF ST. BENEDICT: Insights for the Ages, (New York: Crossroads, 1997), p. 135
[vi] Addendum is correct since the 16th century. Addenda was the older Latin form.
[vii] 1 Corinthians 6:9-11
[viii] The Rule of St. Benedict, Chapter 7, Humility, v.10-13

Sunday, July 12, 2015

“Thy Friend and thy Father’s Friend forget not.”


The Poet Christina Rossetti, 1830-1894 was best known for her poem “Goblin Market”, along with a number of romantic and devotional poems including the Christmas Carol “In the Bleak Midwinter” as well as children’s poems.  Her brother Dante Gabriel Rossetti, with William Holman Hunt, John Everett Millais, and later Edward Burne-Jones and William Morris formed the Pre-Raphaelite brotherhood that sought to return to the simpler and more direct style of painting before Raphael.   Christina Rossetti’s poem “Goblin Market” reflects the Pre-Raphaelite return to nature inspired by the theories of John Ruskin.  The Poem, “Thy Friend and thy Father’s Friend forget not” is part of a large body of her devotional poems, and the title is drawn from the Book of Proverbs.
“Do not forsake your friend and your father's friend, and do not go to your brother's house in the day of your calamity. Better is a neighbor who is near than a brother who is far away” (Proverbs 27:10).  

“Thy Friend and thy Father’s Friend forget not.”

Friends, I commend to you the narrow way:
   Not because I, please God, will walk therein,
   But rather for the Love Feast[i] of that day,
The exceeding prize which whoso will may win.
   Earth is half spent and rotting at the core,
   Here hollow death’s heads mock us with a grin,
Here heartiest laughter leaves us tired and sore.
   Men heap up pleasures and enlarge desire,
   Outlive desire, and famished evermore
Consume themselves within the undying fire.
   Yet not for this God made us: not for this
   Christ sought us far and near to draw us nigher,
Sought us and found and paid our penalties.
   If one could answer “Nay” to God’s command,
   Who shall say “Nay” when Christ pleads all He is
For us, and holds us with a wounded Hand?1

                Thematically the poem divides into four sections; the first, the human predicament and the goal; second fallen creation and fallen creatures; third, God’s design for humankind; and fourth, the irresistible offer of grace.


Section One:

Friends, I commend to you the narrow way:
   Not because I, please God, will walk therein,
   But rather for the Love Feast of that day,
The exceeding prize which whoso will, may win.

            The author calls us friends and commends to us the narrow way, “Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many.  For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few” (Matthew 7:13-14), but she immediately admits her inability to walk therein.  Having read a great deal of her poetry I would say that her incapacity to walk in the narrow way is not from a lack of desire, but from a keen sense that save for the grace of God she knows that there is no good in her. 

            Christina Rossetti, by virtue of her devout Anglicanism, was a true Benedictine at heart. In his Rule, St. Benedict says, “Just as there is a wicked zeal of bitterness which separates from God and leads to hell, so there is a good zeal which separates from evil and leads to God and everlasting life. This then is the good zeal which monks must foster with fervent love.”[ii]

As a devout Anglican and Anglo-Catholic she would be very familiar with the penitentiality and mood of the 1662 Book of Common Prayer.  Collects such as the Collect for the Second Sunday of Lent make our absolute dependence on grace very clear, “Almighty God, who seest that we have no power of ourselves to help ourselves; Keep us both outwardly in our bodies and inwardly in our souls; that we may be defended from all adversities which may happen to the body, and from all evil thoughts which may assault and hurt the soul; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen” (BCP 1662). 

With her we acknowledge that we see the narrow way, recognize its worth, yet recognise that apart from grace we cannot walk in it.  With grace we discover and confess that there are things we have done, and things we have left undone, that have not only created pain for ourselves and others, but have also grieved the heart of our loving Heavenly Father.  We come as penitents before the throne of grace trusting in the merits of Christ Jesus our Lord, Who is Himself our Righteousness when we have none of our own.

We who have washed our robes in the blood of the Lamb are invited to the Love Feast, the Marriage Supper of the Lamb, “Let us rejoice and exult and give him the glory, for the marriage of the Lamb has come, and his Bride has made herself ready; it was granted her to clothe herself with fine linen, bright and pure"- for the fine linen is the righteous deeds of the saints.  And the angel said to me, "Write this: Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb." And he said to me, "These are the true words of God” (Revelation 19:7-9).  To sit at table with Him Whom we adore in the Heavenly Kingdom is the exceeding prize that we, forgetting what lies behind, strain forward to win (Phil. 3:12-16).

Section Two:

            We live in a world that has been corrupted by the Fall of Humankind, and the

   Earth is half spent and rotting at the core,
   Here hollow death’s heads mock us with a grin,
Here heartiest laughter leaves us tired and sore.
   Men heap up pleasures and enlarge desire,
   Outlive desire, and famished evermore
Consume themselves within the undying fire.

                The dangers of this half spent earth rotting at the core are evident in the temptation and fall theme in Goblin Market where the luscious fruits offered by the Goblins lead to addiction and death.  St. Benedict warns us, “We must be on our guard, therefore, against evil desires, for death lies close by the gate of pleasure.”[iii] That is not meant to be an idle warning.

Christina Rossetti herself was torn by the offer of love and ultimately rejected her suitor Charles Cayley. Glenn Everett, Associate Professor of English, University of Tennessee at Martin tells us that “From the early '60s on she was in love with Charles Cayley, but according to her brother William, refused to marry him because "she enquired into his creed and found he was not a Christian." Milk-and-water Anglicanism was not to her taste” (The Victorian Web: The Life of Christina Rossetti).    

What is it the separates “milk and water Anglicans, from true Christians? The 16th Century Anglican Divine, Richard Hooker points to the difference between the visible Church and the mystical Church:

“The visible Church of Jesus Christ is therefore one, in outward profession of those things, which supernaturally appertain to the very essence of Christianity, and are necessarily required in every particular Christian…
Our naming of Jesus as Lord is not enough to prove us Christians unless we embrace the faith he proclaimed…
We are speaking now of the marks of the visible Church and they are One Lord, One Faith, One Baptism. All those who make this external profession are Christians, even if they be impious and excommunicable…
The mystical Church cannot contain such evildoers, but the visible church does. Jesus uses the parable of the net or the wheat and tares. God has always had such a mixed visible Church.[iv]

There is a choice between the cruel but hard option of separating oneself from the half spent and rotting earth, or being consumed by the internal undying fire,  “And if your eye causes you to sin, tear it out. It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than with two eyes to be thrown into hell, 'where their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched.'  For everyone will be salted with fire” (Mark 9:47-49).  It should be noted that Christina distrusted pleasure and desire, even desire for things that were permissible, at one point giving up chess because she enjoyed winning so much (Everett).

            St. Benedict goes on to say, “The second step of humility is that a man loves not his own will nor takes pleasure in the satisfaction of his desires; rather he shall imitate by his actions that saying of the Lord: I have come not do to my own will, but the will of him who sent me (John 6:38).

Similarly we read, ‘Consent merits punishment; constraint wins a crown.’”[v] For contemporary Christians being confronted by the dangers of wilful pleasure is like walking into a bush of stinging nettles.

Section Three:

   Yet not for this God made us: not for this
   Christ sought us far and near to draw us nigher,
Sought us and found and paid our penalties.

There is a strong penitentiality in the 1662 Book of Common Prayer that is reflected in Christina Rossetti’s spirituality and a number of her poems are penitential in nature, yet she is clearly aware that God did not make us in order to have us consume ourselves with undying fire.  Twice she repeats, “not for this . . . not for this.”  No Christ went to the farthest extremes to rescue his lost sheep.  The psalmist says, “Truly no man can ransom himself, or give to God the price of his life, for the ransom of his life is costly, and can never suffice, that he should continue to live on for ever, and never see the Pit.” and, “But God will ransom my soul from the power of Sheol, for he will receive me” (Psalm 49:7-9, 15 RSV).

An Anglican understanding of the work of Christ comes in part from St. Anselm, the Archbishop of Canterbury from 1093 to 1109. “There is an apocryphal story told by St. Anselm in a sermon at Bec:  Justice and mercy were arguing in heaven as they looked down upon the fallen world in the year 1 B.C.  Justice insisted that it should be destroyed, for how else should his position be maintained?  Mercy replied that, in that case, how could his position stand?  They were joined by the divine Logos who, embracing them, said “leave it to me and I will satisfy you both.”[vi] The 1662 Book of Common Prayer, quoting from Holy Scripture, testifies that Christ “sought us and found and paid our penalties.”

Hear what comfortable words our Saviour
     Christ saith unto all that truly turn to him:

COME unto me all that travail and are
heavy laden, and I will refresh you. S.
Matth. 11. 28.

So God loved the world, that he gave his
only-begotten Son, to the end that all that believe
in him should not perish, but have everlasting
life. S. John 3. 16.

Hear also what St. Paul saith:
This is a true saying, and worthy of all men
to be received, That Christ Jesus came into the
world to save sinners. 1 Tim. 1. 15.

Hear also what St. John saith:
If any man sin, we have an Advocate with
the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous; and he is
the propitiation for our sins. 1 S. John 2. 1.


Section Four:

   If one could answer “Nay” to God’s command,
   Who shall say “Nay” when Christ pleads all He is
For us, and holds us with a wounded Hand?

                There is in the poems of Christina Rossetti the ardent response of a loving heart to the pleading of the Christ who died for her.  There is for Christina Rossetti no passive hearing of the offer of Christ.  In another poem she writes:

GOOD FRIDAY

Lord Jesus Christ, grown faint upon the Cross,
   A sorrow beyond sorrow in Thy look,
      The unutterable craving for my soul;
         Thy love for me sufficed
To load upon Thee and make good my loss
   In the darkened heaven and earth that shook:--
      In face of earth and heaven, take Thou my whole
          Heart, O Lord Jesus Christ.2

            Nothing less than the Love Feast, the Marriage Supper of the Lamb will do, that is the exceeding prize she seeks to win.  The gate of heaven is in the suffering and wounds of Christ. “O bone Jesu, exaudi me. Intra tua vulnera absconde me. Ne permittas me separari a te” (The Anima Christi), “O good Jesu, hear me, In your wounds hide me.  Do not permit be to be separated from Thee”.

            The Cross is not the end goal, but rather it is the gate of life.  She prays,

O my King and my heart’s own choice,
   Stretch Thy Hand to Thy fluttering dove;
Teach me, call to me with Thy Voice,
      Wrap me up in Thy Love.3

 


1. Christina Rossetti, The Complete Poems, ed. R. W. Crump & Betty S. Flowers, (London: Penguin Books, 2005), p.410-411
2.  Ibid, p. 436
3.  Ibid. p. 415



[i] Eucharist
[ii] The Rule of St. Benedict, Chapter 72, “The Good Zeal of Monks”
[iii] RB Chapter 7, “On Humility”
[iv] Michael B. Russell, Kindle, Hooker’s Blueprint, 31.4, 3.1.5, 3.1.7
[v] Ibid, RB
[vi] (Martin Thornton, English Spirituality,  (Cambridge: Cowley Press) p. 163).